
Visitors / Employees
- Home
- PLAN PHILLY • Aiming for inclusive public spaces, University City District bucks defensive design trends
PLAN PHILLY • Aiming for inclusive public spaces, University City District bucks defensive design trends
Originally published at Plan Philly
Aiming for inclusive public spaces, University City District bucks defensive design trends
TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 2017 • BY JAKE BLUMGART
University City District covers one of the blessed corners of Philadelphia. There’s little blight or crime for the special services district to contend with. Job growth can fairly be described as explosive. It’s even sprouting a new skyline.
One of the tasks University City District (UCD) has set for itself, and pursued with great skill, is “creative placemaking”. It installs street furniture and pop-up parklets that are meant to maximize public space, transforming underused corners of the city into attractions.
But with public space comes potential conflict, especially between the privileged classes urban designers often cater to and those who live on the margins of city life. In recent years online journalists and activists have documented the “defensive architecture” cities use to drive off various low-status users. Most commonly, a host of design choices are used to keep people experiencing homelessness from lying down and getting some sleep. These range from “bum bars” in the center of park benches to laying down rows of spikes in doorways to prevent anyone from loitering at all.
As UCD expands its placemaking efforts, it has taken a different approach. Special services districts have often been on the quickest to choose defensive design strategies and other policies that target the homeless. Public-private partnerships, like business improvement districts and other special service districts, provide services to their particular areas, going beyond what cash-strapped municipal governments are able to offer. But the constituent base for these districts is often narrow and, critics fear, too limited to the property owners and institutions that found and fund them.
Although UCD is entirely supported by large institutions west of the Schuylkill River, including Drexel University and the University of Pennsylvania, it has bucked the defensive design trend.

“Our goal is to provide a space that doesn’t say ‘get out of here,’” says Alissa Weiss, UCD’s Director of Strategic Initiatives and Communications.
UCD highlights the brightly colored furniture at The Porch, the hugely successful public space it has created around 30th Street Station. The Porch has furniture for the use of weary travelers, including moveable chairs and large swings. During warmer months, homeless people sleeping use the latter.
In the past couple of years, new transit benches have been installed at three trolley stops in West Philadelphia. The benches have segmented seats facing different directions, allowing numerous people to occupy the street furniture at the same time without necessarily having to interact. They are notably free of the obstructions and handrails that chop up most public benches and prevent anyone from sprawling out.
“When I see the most vulnerable members of society using our public places that says we’ve created a space that’s really working,” says Andrew Stober, UCD’s Vice President of Planning and Economic Development. UCD, he says, aims to design and operate public spaces that are welcoming for everyone.
“What makes people feel unsafe is anti-social behavior regardless of who's engaging in it. Drunk frat boys, or someone who spends their night in a shelter and is drunk in a public space—all of that will make people uncomfortable. You can’t design your way out of that."
The lack of impediments to homeless people did cause comment. Before the transit bench at 47th Street and Baltimore Avenue was installed, UCD apprised nearby property owners of its plans. Some shopkeepers expressed fears that the benches would become magnets for panhandling on this neighborhood commercial corridor.
UCD’s response speaks to one of the chief reasons the organization is able to avoid defensive architecture. They told the owner that if there were ever a problem, they should just call the organization’s “ambassadors”—the yellow jacketed unarmed officers who patrol UCD’s territory.
That offer allayed the business owner’s fears. The ambassadors have never been called about the bench.
Stober and Weiss are quick to highlight what separates the ambassadors from police or other security guards. These men and women are not a jack-booted security service, they emphasize, but an outreach effort to put more eyes on the street. They are trained to offer assistance to individuals who they believe may be in distress.
In the last year, UCD began to offer “Mental Health First Aid” training, in which officers are instructed about how to approach people in distress and what to say (or not to say). A longstanding partnership with Project HOME allows the ambassadors to offer homeless individuals meaningful help, if they want it.
In the last couple years, UCD officers have been collecting data on their referrals of homeless individuals to Project HOME for assistance. If the person accepts, then the ambassador will wait with them until the Project HOME outreach team arrives. If not, the ambassador will leave them in peace. If an individual is engaged in violent or antisocial behavior, they are asked to move along. In extreme incidents, the police are called although UCD says there have only been a few times that’s ever been deemed necessary.
Between June 2015 and May 2017, there have been 635 contacts and 201 successful connections to Project HOME. Some were repeat encounters with the same individuals.
“Choosing to work with Project Home was a conscious decision,” says Weiss. “As opposed to just saying ‘here’s some places to get a meal, now get out of here.”
Joan Maya Mazelis, a Rutgers University sociology professor, says that she’s been favorably impressed by UCD’s design efforts. An expert on urban poverty, she says that the BID’s more humane approach stands in stark contrast with the anti-homeless management policies of other forms of privately managed public space.
“They get to enjoy the space like everyone else, which is great because they are citizens of Philadelphia like everybody else,” says Mazelis. And she sees that as a good thing “because it helps take away fear and stigma people have about those who don’t have any place to live.”
There are other factors at work in UCD’s rejection of defensive architecture. Unlike some of the other BIDs that have stirred controversy with their policies towards the homeless, like the Grand Central Partnership in New York, UCD doesn’t have a persistent concentration of homeless people in its jurisdiction. The part of West Philadelphia covered by UCD isn’t known as a center for outdoor sleeping. The more serious potential flash point has been The Porch, which is directly across the river from Center City—where much of Philadelphia’s homeless population is concentrated—and where Amtrak fears an abundance of panhandlers will spook its clientele. But in the end, UCD was able to convince Amtrak that its ambassadors would be able to handle any disturbances.
“People who are pretty clearly living in shelters use The Porch a lot,” says Stober. “There’s a woman who sleeps pretty regularly at The Porch, with her shopping cart where she has all her worldly belongings neatly packed in. She takes one of the big swings and I don’t think she makes anyone uncomfortable.”
Stober remembers one recent afternoon when he saw her asleep on her regular swing and another man—bearing luggage, dressed in professional attire, and presumably waiting for a train—asleep on the swing next to hers.
“Sleeping is when we are at our most vulnerable, if there is a place where you feel safe to sleep it says a lot about the success of a space,” says Stober.
View by Category
View By Date
- November 2022 (1)
- September 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (1)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (2)
- May 2021 (1)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (2)
- February 2021 (5)
- January 2021 (3)
- December 2020 (2)
- October 2020 (2)
- September 2020 (7)
- July 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (1)
- May 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (8)
- November 2019 (2)
- September 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (2)
- March 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (1)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (7)
- August 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (2)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (3)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (5)
- December 2017 (3)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (3)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (7)
- June 2017 (6)
- May 2017 (3)
- April 2017 (2)
- March 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (6)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (3)
- June 2016 (6)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (7)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (2)
- December 2015 (2)
- November 2015 (7)
- October 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (22)
- June 2015 (18)
- May 2015 (8)
- April 2015 (8)
- March 2015 (12)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (3)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (2)
- October 2014 (11)
- September 2014 (14)
- August 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (7)
- June 2014 (13)
- May 2014 (1)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (4)
- January 2014 (2)
- December 2013 (2)
- November 2013 (6)
- October 2013 (13)
- September 2013 (13)
- August 2013 (6)
- July 2013 (14)
- June 2013 (16)
- April 2013 (2)
- March 2013 (3)
- January 2013 (5)
- November 2012 (3)
- October 2012 (3)
- September 2012 (3)
- August 2012 (2)
- July 2012 (5)
- June 2012 (12)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (2)
- January 2012 (1)
- December 2011 (5)
- November 2011 (11)
- October 2011 (1)
- September 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)